Thank you for Mr. Morrison’s article "Victory on
the cross" in the April/May 2007 edition. There are some aspects to this article
that I ask you to please think about. It says, "Christ is fully divine, and he
has (present tense) a human body."
Did you know that the New Testament does not teach
that Jesus had a human body after his resurrection? This is a Roman Catholic
teaching.
KW, e-mail
The bodily resurrection from the dead of Jesus
Christ is central to Christianity, not just a belief of the Roman Catholic
Church. Scripture, traditional Christian confessions and orthodox Christian
belief deny that Jesus was resurrected as immaterial spirit. The empty tomb of
Jesus attests to this fact.
I liked very much the article entitled "Evidence of
Black Africans in the Bible." However, I’m confused as to your organization’s
belief that "all" are God’s children. Don’t you have to be a believer (i.e., a
Christian) to be an adopted child of God?
Don’t all others sit under the wrath of God
awaiting judgment? Therefore they cannot be his children, but rather vessels
fitted for destruction. Are not all people on the path of condemnation until God
causes them to regenerate and believe and become children of God?
E-mail
The statement you quoted and the article itself was
not discussing the resurrection to life as opposed to the judgment to
condemnation (John 5:28-30) or who will be in either, and on what basis. It
pointed out that all races are equally God’s creation—and thus equally his
children—and that no one, black, white, yellow, or brown, is excluded from his
love and purpose. As the Scripture says, "For God so loved the world [meaning
everyone] that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall
not perish but have eternal life" (John 3:16).
The article "No Contest" in the June/July 2007
Christian Odyssey is aptly titled. I suggest that the article will ignite
more conflict and polarization rather than move all readers toward logical
resolution of the current concepts among Christians surrounding Genesis and
Creation. The article was not big enough to cover all of the paradigms of the
players involved and so it is aptly titled, "No Contest."
RG, Australia
The article was intended to be a contribution to
the debate—not the last word on the topic. It focuses on one aspect of the
debate, and makes no attempt to cover all the questions. How could it? How could
anything? This is a vast and controversial subject. Whatever our preconceived
ideas, or whatever side of the debate we find ourselves on, we need to update
our thinking and not cling to ideas that both modern research and reliable
biblical scholarship have shown to be untenable.
Your argument that Genesis isn’t to be taken
literally is not surprising. So many church leaders have taken this stand to
avoid the fuss—and need—to explain that Genesis is the literal word of God.
"Let’s just all get along and not upset anyone" is the call of the day for many
church leaders.
Why defend the Christian faith as the word of God
when you can change the story(s) however you wish? Please delete me from any of
your mailing or email lists. I get enough information telling me "well…the Bible
doesn’t really mean that" all the time.
BH, Ohio
We will remove your name from the list if that is
what you really want. But why cancel just because you don’t agree with an
article? Are you sure we have "changed the story"—or have we tried to understand
it in the way that it was intended? If you read the article carefully, you will
see that it supports the Bible by offering a sound explanation to a subject that
causes many people to dismiss the whole book as nonsense.
Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for your cover
article in the June/July issue of Christian Odyssey ("No Contest: Why the
Argument over Genesis?"). We are constantly wearied by the seemingly solid front
of young-earth creationism presented by the "mainstream" American evangelical
establishment. The most militant of these "young-earthers" essentially insist
that one cannot be a Christian without subscribing to their paradigm. It is
refreshing to read an unshackled perspective. The information about cosmogony
was interesting and makes so much sense.
E-mail
I love your magazine. It’s colorful and full of
thought-provoking articles. Enclosed is a check to help meet your costs. Thanks
for a job well done.
LP, Pennsylvania
I would like to give a donation to help support
your ministry for others to have Odyssey also—as far as it reaches.
EM, Colorado