|
|
But it was his third reason for cancellation that really threw me. I quote: "Also on the back of the issue it shows a picture of a barefoot man looking at the magazine. How tacky!" I had to read that twice. Then I looked again at the offending photograph.
He’s right. We show a young man sitting on what looks like a bed or a couch, reading Christian Odyssey. And yes, he does have bare feet. Why is this a problem? Sorry, but I just don’t see the difficulty. But I do think it illustrates another one. As we go though life, we accumulate a collection of habits, prejudices and inhibitions. Some we have inherited from our culture. Others we may have inflicted on ourselves. Some are sensible, some are less so, while some are downright quirky. For example, my grandmother drilled into me when I was young that it was a sin to eat a slice of bread with jelly on it before I had eaten a slice spread with just butter. Why she believed this, I do not know. But to her it was almost matter of faith. That is the problem. These individual quirks can become so ingrained that they become items of faith. And we often carry them over into our belief system when we embrace Christianity. That’s OK. The way of Jesus is big enough to include our foibles. Providing, that is, they do not become reasons to judge and condemn others. Paul, who perhaps more than any other New Testament figure had to deal with his converts’ idiosyncrasies, put this in perspective. Look what he told the Christians at Rome:
We who represent God face more important issues than what to eat, or matters of the calendar. And certainly more than whether or not it is OK to be photographed with bare feet. I suppose in the interests of
peace-making I could ask our designer to paint in some socks. But that really is
not the problem, is it? The problem is that we must not allow our "druthers" to
define our Christianity. Jesus wants us to be bigger than that. •
|