| "Have we grasped
today’s controversial issues correctly? What will future generations see
as our 'common assumptions'?" |
Early church history is
sometimes presented as a struggle against a "great conspiracy," when, in a "lost
century," the "faith once delivered" was undermined by "false prophets" who
introduced "pagan" ideas.
That’s an idea that seriously
lacks historical "depth perception." The real story of the church is one of
continual struggle, punctuated with moments of turmoil, as sincere but
less-than-perfect men and women tried to respond to the challenges of their
times. Even the earliest Christians—those who knew and were taught by Jesus
personally—took a long time to grasp something we now take for granted: that
Gentiles should be accepted as equal partners in the faith.
In the second and third
centuries other issues arose. Some of these would also leave us today saying,
"Huh? That was a problem for them?"
Like, for example, a question
about the nature of Jesus. "Was he really God in the flesh?" Or was he a created
being, endowed by God with very special powers? Ideas and doctrines we now
accept without question were once hot issues, debated with passion, tension
and—sometimes, even intrigue.
We tell the story of the
"battle" for Jesus’ divinity in an article in this issue. I hope you will find
it interesting, even if history is "not your thing."
Church history is not just the
province of scholars. Our faith today also faces some important questions—about
abortion, homosexuality, the role of women, the plight of the poor, evolution
and an appropriate Christian response to the environmental crisis, to name only
a few. Passions run high on all sides, and the answers are not easy. Some will
disagree with that, claiming that the answers are so obvious there is no room
for discussion. Here some depth perception will help.
As C. S. Lewis wrote, "Nothing
strikes me more when I read the controversies of past ages than the fact that
both sides were usually assuming without question a good deal which we should
now absolutely deny. They thought that they were as completely opposed as two
sides could be, but in fact they were all the time secretly united—united with
each other and against earlier and later ages—by a great mass of common
assumptions. We may be sure that the characteristic blindness of the twentieth
century—the blindness about which posterity will ask, ‘But how could they have
thought that?’—lies where we have never suspected it."
Remember how just two centuries
ago, sincere Christians vigorously defended slavery on biblical grounds? Within
living memory, the Bible was invoked to support segregation and Apartheid? We
should not be so sure we have grasped today’s controversial issues correctly.
What will future generations see as our "great mass of common assumptions"?
Jesus promised that the Holy
Spirit would guide believers into all truth (John 16:13). But that guidance
often comes by the Spirit working through fallible human beings. So politics,
prejudice and intolerance compete with a genuine passion for the truth.
The story of the battle over the
divinity of Jesus is instructive on many levels. A vital truth was preserved,
but how it was preserved can leave us wincing. Let’s learn from the past,
not just to strive earnestly to maintain the integrity of the faith, but also to
treat each other with the love, mercy and patience of Jesus while we are doing
it. •