|
That was okay when you had folks out there who were coming in your
direction—were in your aisle of the spiritual options supermarket, so to
speak. But that is not where they came from.
So has it worked in terms of turning the tide of church going? Clearly no.
In North America, if you believe the marketing figures, which I don’t, between
39 and 43 percent are supposed to be in church on Sunday. But when you change
the research methodology and see who is actually there, it is estimated that
only between 18 and 25 percent of the population are actually in church.
CO:
Do you think it is a mistake to assume genuine church growth is subject to
market forces? There is some brilliant marketing of Christianity. But does it
misrepresent the "product’"?
EG: It certainly can. If we use
marketing techniques to edit the gospel, so that only those aspects which
serve our purpose are highlighted, then it is no longer the gospel. There is
a tendency to proclaim a gospel that meets people’s needs without
challenging their priorities or values. We fill our churches with members
that are not disciples. There is little evidence of life transformation,
particularly amongst those who are simply at the worship service once a
week.
It is only when you separate out the 10 percent who are involved beyond the
worship service that you see a significant statistical difference in
lifestyle. If it is just the general churchgoing population, there is little
difference between them and the population at large when you look at their
attitudes on racism, truth telling, divorce and lifestyle in general.
CO: What are we doing wrong?
EG:
We have not recognized a profound cultural shift. From the conversion of the
Emperor Constantine until the First World War in Europe and the 1960s in
America, churches have lived in a "Christendom" framework. By that I mean
most people were at least notionally Christian. They would come to church
for weddings and baptisms and funerals.
|
"There is a tendency to proclaim a gospel that meets people’s needs
without challenging their priorities or values."
|
Under that umbrella the church was a central institution of society and our
strategy in communicating good news was "come to us on our terms, to events
where we are in the majority and in power." Now we are no longer within a
Christendom framework. We are in post-Christendom—some would say a neo-pagan
society. In that environment you don’t operate in a "come to us" way. But most
church leaders are not trained to function in that environment.
Look at the
various positions listed in Ephesians 4:11. This, remember, is a pre-Christendom
model of leadership that emphasizes the need for missional leadership. It is
apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers. The pastors and teachers
are your settlers—the others are the pioneers. We don’t train pioneers; we train
settlers. As Leslie Newbiggin said when he returned from India and settled in
Birmingham, we are in a missionary situation but we don’t train missionaries. So
we have a chronic shortage of "APE’s"—apostles, prophets and evangelists.
We
have to define the church not as a place but as people. Not a gathering but a
community. We have got to turn the idea of church inside out.
|